In most cases when it comes to movies, the audiences usually prefer that original to the sequels. However, there are some rare cases where the audience tends to prefer the sequels over the originals.
As we said, the cases may be rare but that does not mean that they do not exist. And in this post, we will look at those rare cases where the movie sequels were better than the originals.
Movie Sequels vs Originals
Batman Begins 2005 vs The Dark Night 2008
In 2005, the world was officially introduced to Bruce Wayne as The Batman. As good as The Batman may have been, the votes came in and the world definitely loved The Dark Night (check out its online slot at crazy vegas casino) over the Batman. That shows that the sequel was definitely better than the original.
In The Dark Night, the audience was introduced to Heath Ledger as The Joker, and we all know that it does not get better than that.
Spiderman 2002 vs the Spider-Man 2004
Peter Parker or the friendly neighbourhood Spiderman as viewers know him has appeared in several movies. He also has his own stand-alone movies as well. And in those movies, viewers preferred the Spiderman 2 over the Spiderman.
The reason why people loved Spiderman 2 was that the movie had better jokes, a darker tone as well as a richer emotional core. This why is why it is no shock that we can see the Spiderman in a number of real money usa casino online slots.
Rise of the Planet of the Apes 2011 vs Dawn of the Planet Apes 2014
In general, the Planet of the Apes movies were both amazing. But since the movie has a sequel, it shows that there was a little something that was missing in the first one that the seconds one had. And that is why many viewers prefer the sequel to the original.
In Dawn of the Planet of the Apes, we see how Apes fight against humans in an apocalyptic, cross-species standoff that leaves viewers breathless.