Let the armchair psychoanalysis begin. The Virginia Tech shooter has a name and factoids about Cho Seung-Hui are starting to filter in.
We're learning he was quiet and disturbed. Evidence of his disturbed nature comes from accusations he set fire to his dorm, stalked women on campus and wrote alarming one-act plays for his playwriting class. He quoted lyrics from my favourite Guns N' Roses song in one such story in which a group of teenagers plot to kill a teacher who is ruining their lives.
These acts are typically performed by angry young men. Cho Seung-Hui was quiet, disturbed, a loner and very, very angry. I remember teenage anger. I remember that burning rage within and the rush that seemed to thrive off it. If you've never been a young man, you can't know this anger. It festers, it swells, and in the case of Cho Seung-hui, it erupted.
Many years removed from such angst, I can honestly say I'm no longer angry. The fury dissipated long ago. Many of us can harness the rage, channel it elsewhere and maintain total control. Some, cannot.
Cho Seung-hui was 23 years old. The talk shows and infotainment outlets will debate why a student in the final year of an English degree would murder so many before taking his own life. He was angry, yes, but many angry young men survive their rage without touching a weapon. What made Cho Seung-hui different?
After reading the plays on fellow classmate Ian MacFarlanes blog
http://newsbloggers.aol.com/2007/04/17/cho-seung-huis-plays/
I can't believe this wasn't
turned into the counselors or
even the Dean. His writing is a reflection of just how disturbed he was and reads very similar to the
writings my patients share with me.
Being that he was an english major and a senior it would be interesting to see what any of his earlier writings in childhood and early teen years were like. His thought content is disorganized and full of feelings of persecution and rage.
Hopefully these shootings will bring pause to our lives to reevaluate our approaches with each other and caution us to be more attentive and watchful as to those we surround ourselves with. Whether it be at school or at work where
students/employees have been
known to come in and gun down
their peers or at all the other places where people become close enough to
know one another and
(subsequently) develop the
passion required to murder those acquaintances. It's about being attentive -- not just to whether someone's packing heat but whether or not they're capable of doing so.