Link: The Worst President in History?
Published by Toronto Mike on April 20, 2006 @ 19:06 in Links to External Web Sites
The Worst President in History? - Here's an excerpt from this Rolling Stone cover story.
The president came to office calling himself "a uniter, not a divider" and promising to soften the acrimonious tone in Washington. He has had two enormous opportunities to fulfill those pledges: first, in the noisy aftermath of his controversial election in 2000, and, even more, after the attacks of September 11th, when the nation pulled behind him as it has supported no other president in living memory. Yet under both sets of historically unprecedented circumstances, Bush has chosen to act in ways that have left the country less united and more divided, less conciliatory and more acrimonious -- much like James Buchanan, Andrew Johnson and Herbert Hoover before him. And, like those three predecessors, Bush has done so in the service of a rigid ideology that permits no deviation and refuses to adjust to changing realities. Buchanan failed the test of Southern secession, Johnson failed in the face of Reconstruction, and Hoover failed in the face of the Great Depression. Bush has failed to confront his own failures in both domestic and international affairs, above all in his ill-conceived responses to radical Islamic terrorism. Having confused steely resolve with what Ralph Waldo Emerson called "a foolish consistency . . . adored by little statesmen," Bush has become entangled in tragedies of his own making, compounding those visited upon the country by outside forces.
I'm not gonna say I told you so.
Entry Permalink |
1 comment |
Tweet |


Entry Permalink
1 comment
Tee
April 21, 2006 / 00:33
I'm still going to say Buchanan was worse. I'll wait for the Iraq War to be over before I judge Bush. I could be waiting a looooong time. If the Iraq democracy succeeds, Bush may go down in history as being a decent president.
History is always better at these things than present opinion anyways.